238 GRAHAM V. STATE [302 Cite as 302 Ark. 238 (1990) William A. GRAHAM v. STATE of Arkansas RC 90-19 - 788 S.W.2d 243 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 7, 1990 APPEAL & ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK DENIED. — Where the attorney for the appellant did not concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, and where other good cause was not shown, the motion for rule on the clerk was denied. Motion for Rule on the Clerk; denied. Witt Law Firm, by: Ernie Witt, for appellant. No response. PER CURIAM. William A. Graham, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant. [1] However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Graham will concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.