Cite as 2009 Ark. 444 ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT No. CR 09-545 Opinion Delivered September 24, 2009 PRO SE PETITION FOR REVIEW AND RICHARD DONNELL GEORGE MOTION FOR RELEASE ON BOND Petitioner [CIRCUIT COURT OF MILLER COUNTY, CR 99-31, HON. KIRK D. JOHNSON, JUDGE] v. STATE OF ARKANSAS PETITION DISMISSED; MOTION Respondent MOOT. PER CURIAM The petitioner, Richard Donnell George, appealed an order revoking his probation to the Arkansas Court of Appeals. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment. George v. State, 2009 Ark. App. 299, 2009 WL 1086471 (unpublished). Petitioner has now filed in this court a pro se petition for review of the decision by the court of appeals. After filing his petition, petitioner filed a pro se motion requesting release on bond during the continuation of his appeal. We do not reach the merits of the petition because petitioner filed the petition proceeding pro se, even though he was represented by counsel on appeal. We do not allow a petitioner to substitute his judgment, concerning whether and how to request a petition for review, for that of his attorney. Brewer v. State, 371 Ark. 532, 268 S.W.3d 332 (2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition without further consideration. Petitioner’s motion for bond is therefore moot. Petition dismissed; motion moot.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.