Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

Cite as 2009 Ark. 440 ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT No. CR 09-389 Opinion Delivered September 24, 2009 PRO SE MOTION FOR EXTENSION MANUEL ENRIQUE CAMACHO OF BRIEF TIME [CIRCUIT COURT OF Appellant BENTON COUNTY, CR 2006-802(B)] v. MOTION MOOT. STATE OF ARKANSAS Appellee PER CURIAM Appellant Manuel Enrique Camacho has lodged a pro se appeal here from the circuit courts denial of a pro se postconviction petition pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1. Now before us is his pro se motion for an extension of time to file his brief-in-chief. Appellants brief was due to be filed in this court on May 26, 2009. Appellant timely tendered the brief on May 8, 2009, and the brief was returned to him for correction. The corrected brief was due to be filed by June 8, 2009. At the same time he tendered the brief, appellant filed the instant motion for extension of time, seeking until June 15, 2009, to file the brief. In the motion, appellant contends that he has not been supplied with a copy of his transcript that is necessary to prepare the abstract portion of the brief. Thereafter, on June 8, 2009, appellant filed his brief, abstract and addendum. As appellant timely filed the brief, the motion for extension of time is moot. Motion moot.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.