Cite as 2009 Ark. 438 ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT No. CR 09-374 TYWAN WINSTON Appellant v. STATE OF ARKANSAS Appellee PER CURIAM In 2007, a jury found appellant Tywan Winston guilty of capital murder and sentenced him to life imprisonment without parole. This court affirmed the judgment. Winston v. State, 372 Ark. 19, 269 S.W.3d 809 (2007). Appellant timely filed in the trial court a pro se notice of appeal of an order denying postconviction relief. The appeal was lodged in this court, with our docket reflecting that appellant is represented by counsel, Mr. Mark Alan Jesse. Mr. Jesse filed appellant’s brief. Appellant later tendered a pro se brief that was returned to him, in which he requests permission to file a pro se brief. This court will not permit an appellant to compete with his attorney to be heard in an appeal. Brewer v. State, 371 Ark. 532, 268 S.W.3d 332 (2007) (per curiam). If appellant is represented by counsel, he may not submit his own brief in competition with his attorney’s. Appellant contends 1 Appellant’s pro se brief was returned and not held because it was not signed by appellant.Opinion Delivered September 24, 2009 APPELLANT’S PRO SE MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PRO SE BRIEF AND APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR STAY OF BRIEF TIME [CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, CR 2006-3399, HON. WILLARD PROCTOR, JR., JUDGE] APPELLANT’S MOTION DENIED; APPELLEE’S MOTION GRANTED. 1 and he has now filed this motion
Cite as 2009 Ark. 438 that he terminated his representation by Mr. Jesse, and that the brief that Mr. Jesse filed was submitted without his consent. The record, however, indicates that Mr. Jesse was attorney-of-record below and does not reflect that Mr. Jesse was relieved as counsel. Under Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal 16(a), once an attorney represents a defendant in a criminal matter, the attorney is obligated to continue representing the defendant until relieved by the appropriate court. Wann v. State, 369 Ark. 426, 255 S.W.3d 473 (2007) (per curiam). Under no circumstances may an attorney who has not been relieved by the court abandon an appeal. Id. Further, counsel representing a client whose petition under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 is denied must continue to represent that client on appeal until relieved. Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.3(b). Mr. Jesse was clearly still obligated to represent appellant when appellant’s brief was filed. We do not treat appellant’s motion as one to relieve Mr. Jesse so that he may file a pro se brief because he has not submitted an appropriate affidavit. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-1(c). Nor do we treat the motion as one to supplement the brief because appellant does not allege that the brief is in any particular way deficient; he only avers that his own brief has merit. An appellant is not permitted to supplement a brief filed by counsel unless he clearly shows that counsel’s brief is lacking. Gidron v. State, 312 Ark. 517, 850 S.W.2d 331 (1993) (per curiam) (citing Wade v. State, 288 Ark. 94, 702 S.W.2d 28 (1986) (per curiam)). Accordingly, we deny the motion. Appellee State, in addition to its response, has filed a motion that requests an extension of fifteen days in which to file its own brief addressing the issues in the brief filed by counsel. We grant the motion. Appellee’s brief is due here no later than fifteen days from the date of this -2-
Cite as 2009 Ark. 438 opinion. Appellant’s motion denied; appellee’s motion granted. -3-
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.