Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

Cite as 2009 Ark. 328 (unpublished) ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT No. CR 09-382 Opinion Delivered May 28, 2009 WESLEY E. GRISSOM Petitioner PRO SE MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL [CIRCUIT COURT OF GARLAND COUNTY, CR 2006-611, v. HON. MARCIA R. HEARNSBERGER, JUDGE] STATE OF ARKANSAS Respondent MOTION DENIED. PER CURIAM In 2008, petitioner Wesley E. Grissom entered a plea of guilty to first-degree sexual assault and was sentenced to 660 months imprisonment. The judgment and commitment order was filed on September 18, 2008. On April 14, 2009, petitioner filed in this court a pro se motion for a belated appeal from the judgment. Therein, petitioner contends that he has a constitutional right to an appeal. Further, he states that his trial counsel refused to pursue the appeal because counsel advised him that there was no right to an appeal from petitioners guilty plea. Arkansas Rules of Appellate ProcedureCriminal 1(a) provides that there is no direct appeal from a plea of guilty. An exception is created when a conditional plea of guilty is premised on an appeal of the denial of a suppression motion pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.3. Seibs v. State, 357 Ark. 331, 166 S.W.3d 16 (2004). Two other exceptions to the general rule, as set out in Seibs and Bradford v. State, 351 Ark. 394, 94
Cite as 2009 Ark. 328 (unpublished) S.W.3d 904 (2003), are (1) when there is a challenge to testimony or evidence presented before a jury in a sentencing hearing separate from the plea itself, and (2) when the appeal is from a posttrial motion challenging the validity and legality of the sentence itself. Here, petitioner does not contend, and the record does not reflect, that his plea of guilty was conditional or fit within one of the above exceptions. As a result, petitioner had no right to an appeal from the September 18, 2008, judgment. The motion for belated appeal is meritless. Motion denied. -2-
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.