ARK.] FORREST V. STATE 165 Cite as 286 Ark. 165 (1985) Mikey Dale FORREST v. STATE of Arkansas 690 S.W.2d 1 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 28, 1985 APPEAL & ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK — ATTORNEY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FILE RECORD. — The attorney is responsible for filing the record; he cannot shift that responsibility to the trial judge or to the court reporter. Motion for Rule on the Clerk; denied. John F. Gibson, Jr., for appellant. No response. 111 PER CURIAM. With respect to this motion for a rule on the clerk, the attorney for the appellant insists that it is the court reporter's responsibility to prepare the record and to notify the attorney if more time is needed. Counsel therefore refuses
166 [286 to recognize his responsibility for filing the record on time. Counsel is in error. We have repeatedly held that the attorney is responsible for filing the record and cannot shift that responsibility to the trial judge or to the court reporter. See, for example, Christopher v. Jones, 271 Ark. 911, 611 S.W. 2d 521 (1981). As stated in our per curiam order on belated appeals in criminal cases, 265 Ark. 964, we put "the responsibility where it belongs, on the shoulders of the lawyer who is at fault." No good cause having been shown for the tardy filing of the record in this case, the motion for a rule on the clerk is denied.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.