STEWART, ADM'X V. SMITH, ADM'X ARK.] Cite as 269 Ark. 363 (1980) 363 Ada STEWART, Administratrix of the Estate of Wesley SHAW, Sr., and Dixie Mae SHAW v. Dessie K. SMITH, Administratrix of the Estate of Carolyn SHAW, Deceased, and Wesley SHAW, Jr. 80-91 601 S.W. 2d 837 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 23, 1980 DESCENT & DISTRIBUTION — RIGHT OF ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN TO INHERIT FROM THEIR FATHERS. — The opinion of the Court of Appeals reversing the chancellor's decision in the instant case,
STEWART, AIDM 'X V. SMITH, ADM'X 364 Cite as 269 Ark. 363 (1980) [269 delivered March 5, 1980, is affirmed, with the amplification of its opinion to point out that litigation was pending as to the rights of petitioners to inherit as illegitimate descendents of the decedent at the time of the decision in Trimble v. Gordon, 430 U.S. 762, 97 S. Ct. 1459, 52 L. Ed. 2d 31, on April 26, 1977, which held unconstitutional a state statute prohibiting illegitimate children from inheriting from their fathers. On certiorari to the Court of Appeals on its reversal of the Pulaski Probate Court, First Division, Murray 0. Reed, Judge; affirmed. Charles A. Brown, for petitioners. Jewell Brown, P.A., for respondents. PER CURIAM We granted certiorari in this case since it involves the interpretation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 50-411 (Repl. 1971) and Ark. Stat. Ann. § 61-141 (d) (Supp. 1979). In affirming the Court of Appeals, we only amplify its opinion on the issue of illegitimacy, § 61-141 (d). The verified petition for appointment of a personal representative for the estate of the decedent, Wesley Shaw, Sr., signed by petitioner Shaw, was filed by him on December 1, 1975. He listed himself as an heir with the relationship of "son". He also listed as grandchildren the two infant children of petitioner Smith's decedent. As indicated in the Court of Appeals' opinion, the respondent, Ada Stewart, filed an objection to this proceeding on December 24, 1975, raising the question of their illegitimacy. That objection specifically asserted that as a "natural sister" of the decedent, she might have an interest as an intestate heir and that any claim by petitioner Smith's decedent and petitioner Shaw "derives solely from their status as alleged illegitimate children and or descendants of such illegitimate children of the decedent." Further, the personal representative, appointed at the request of petitioner Shaw, "is the nominee of persons whose interest in this litigation is adverse to petitioner both in theory and in fact." In the circumstances, we hold as of April 26, 1977 (the
Am.] 365 date of the decision in Trimble v. Gordon, 430 U.S. 762, 97 S. Ct. 1459, 52 L. Ed. 2d 31 [1977]), litigation was pending as to the right of petitioners to inherit as illegitimate descendants of the decedent. Lucas v. Handcock, 266 Ark. 142, 583 S.W. 2d 491 (1979). See also Compton, Adm'x v. White, Guardian, 266 Ark. 648, 587 S.W. 2d 829 (1979). With this additional observation, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is affirmed in its entirety. Affirmed.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.