VoL. 18 *BARKELOO ET AL. [*297 V. MILLER. Mr. Justice Scott. This was a set. fa. to revive a judg— ment on a forthcoming bond. The case is the counterpart of thal of Miller v. ]3arkeloo, just decided, where the judginent that was revived in this case was held to have been annulled. The judgment in this case must, therefore, be reversed.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.