JAN. TERM, 1857. BENDER V. BRIDGE. BENDER V. BRIDGE & CO. It is error to issuc a joint writ of garnishment agaimt several, with allegations of a several instead of a joind indehtedness. Error to Yukiski Circuit Court. ON. JOHN. J. CLENDENIN, H Circuit Judge. Watkins & Gallagher, for the plaintiff. Bertrand, for the defendants. SCOTT, J. This cause was brought here by writ of error to the Pulaski circuit court, sued out by Bender.
VOL. 18 The facts of the case, in all that is material to the point of law involved, are the same, as in the case of the Cincin-nati and Little Rock Slate Co. v. Bridge 2929 *dz Co. (17 Ark. R. p. ), following the cases of Thorn & Robins v. Woodruff et al., 5 Ark. R. 55, and More/and et al. v. Pelham, 7 Ark. R. 338. Upon the authority of these cases the judgment in question must be reversed, and the cause remanded. NOT E.—See note 1, Thorn v. Woodruff, 5-58.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.