5 g TATUM v. CROWNOVER. [94 TATUM v. CROWNOVRR. Opinion delivered Vebruary 21, 1910. APPEAL AND ERROR — PRESIniPTION.—Where the bill of exceptions in a chancery cause was not filed within the time allowed by the court, the presump tion will be indulged that the decree was correct. Appeal from Yell Chancery Court, Dardanelle District ; Jeremiah G. Wallace, Chancellor ; affirmed. L. C. Hall, for appellants. U. L. Meade, for appellees. HART, J. This was a chancery suit instituted by appellees against appellants. The record shows that the case was heard on oral evidence. A decree was entered in favor of appellee on the 8th day of April, 1909, and the appellants were given 60 days within which to prepare and file a bill of exceptions. The bill of exceptions was signed by the chancellor and filed with the clerk on the 26th day of June, 1909, which was not within the time granted. Therefore, the evidence is not brought in the record, and the presumption is that the decree was correct. The decree will, therefore, be affirmed.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.