ERVIN V. STATE
ARK.] Cite as 352 Ark. 517 (2003) 517 Duke E. ERVIN v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 03-278 102 S.W.3d 501 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 10, 2003 1. APPEAL & ERROR - MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL - GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. - An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that a notice of appeal was not timely filed due to a mistake on his part, is good cause to grant the motion. 2. APPEAL & ERROR - MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL - DENIED. - Appellant's appointed counsel filed a motion requesting that other counsel be appointed to represent appellant where appellant had retained counsel at trial but could not longer afford retained counsel on appeal; the supreme court, although mindful of the substantial caseload born by the public defender's office, in the absence of any conflict of interest, would not relieve the public defender's
ERVIN V. STATE 518 Cite as 352 Ark. 517 (2003) [352 office as appellant's counsel on appeal; the motion for appointment of counsel was, therefore, denied. Motion for Belated Appeal and Motion for Appointment of Counsel; granted in part and denied in part. William R. Simpson, Jr., Public Defender, by: Clint Miller, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant. No response. ER CURIAM. Appellant Duke E. Ervin by and through phis attorney, Clint Miller, has filed a motion for a belated appeal from his convictions of first-degree battery and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Appellant was convicted following a jury trial on September 30, 2002. The judgment and commitment order was entered on October 3, 2002. On Decem-ber 3, 2002, Appellant filed an untimely pro se notice of appeal in the Pulaski County Circuit Court. On that same day, he also filed motions requesting permission to proceed in forma pauperis and requesting the appointment of counsel to pursue his appeal. The trial court held a hearing on these motions on February 3, 2003. At that hearing, the trial court relieved John Purtle, who had represented Appellant at trial, from further representation of Appellant. The trial court further appointed the Sixth Judicial District Public Defender's Office as Appellant's counsel on appeal. [1] Appellant now seeks permission to file a belated appeal from this court. Attached to his petition is an affidavit from Mr. Purtle accepting complete responsibility for failing to timely file the notice of appeal. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Jacks v. State, 344 Ark. 405, 39 S.W.3d 459 (2001) (per curiam); Donald v. State, 341 Ark. 803, 20 S.W.3d 331 (2000) (per curiam); Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978). The motion for belated appeal is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See In Re: Belated Appeals In Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). Appellant's appointed appellate counsel has also filed a motion requesting that this court appoint new counsel to represent Appellant. According to counsel, the public defender's office already has a
Atuc] 519 substantial caseload consisting of appeals of those persons it represented at the trial level. It further avers that it does not wish to become appellate counsel for those persons represented by retained counsel at trial who can no longer afford retained counsel on appeal. While we are mindful of the substantial caseload it bears, in the absence of any conflict of interest, this court will not relieve the public defender's office as Appellant's counsel on appeal. [2] The motion for appointment of counsel is, therefore, denied.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.