ARK.] 53 Rickey NEWMAN v. STATE of Arkansas CR 02-811 84 S.W.3d 43 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 12, 2002 ATTORNEY & CLIENT - MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY ON APPEAL - DENIED. - A state-salaried, full-time public defender's motion to be relieved as counsel for appellant in a criminal appeal was denied because the motion did not state whether the attorney was provided a state-funded secretary; the supreme court stated that counsel could resubmit his motion, providing information about whether he was provided a state-funded secretary, in order for the court to determine whether he qualified for dismissal in light of Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2001). Motion to Withdraw as Attorney on Appeal; denied. Robert C. Marquette, for appellant. No response. ER CURIAM. Robert C. Marquette, a state-salaried, p full-time public defender for the Twenty-First Judicial District, was appointed by the trial court to represent Appellant Rickey Newman, an indigent defendant, on the charge of capital murder. Following a trial, Newman was convicted of the charge and sentenced to death. A timely notice of appeal was filed by the circuit clerk, pursuant to Ark. R. App. P.—Crim. 10, and the record was timely lodged in this court. Mr. Marquette now asks to be relieved as counsel for Appellant in this criminal appeal, based on the case of Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000). There, this court determined that state-salaried, full-time public defenders were ineligible for compensation by the court for work performed in the appeal of a matter in which the public defender represented the defendant. Mr. Marquette also relies on the case of Tester v. State, 341 Ark. 281, 16 S.W.3d 227 (2000) (per curium), wherein this court relieved the appellant's court-appointed public defender and appointed new counsel on appeal under similar circumstances.
54 [350 Since the time of those decisions, however, the law was changed by the General Assembly. Particularly, Act 1370 of 2001 provided in part: "Persons employed as full-time public defenders who are not provided a state funded secretary, may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Arkansas Supreme Court or the Arkansas Court of Appeals." That provision is now codified as Ark. Code Ann. 5 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2001). [1] Mr. Marquette's motion does not state whether he is provided a state-funded secretary. Accordingly, we must deny his motion at this time. See Mills v. State, 347 Ark. 695, 66 S.W.3d 643 (2002) (per curiam). Mr. Marquette may resubmit his motion, providing information about whether he is provided a state-funded secretary, in order for us to determine whether he qualifies for dismissal in light of section 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B). Motion denied.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.