Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

BILYEU v. STATE ARK ] Cite as 340 Ark. 417 (2000) 417 James BILYEU v. STATE of Arkansas CR 98-1480 10 S.W3d 105 Supreme Court of Arkansas Motion for Permission to File Belated Brief granted February 17, 2000 Concurring opinion delivered February 17, 2000 Motion for Permission to File Belated Brief; granted. Hurst Law Offices, by: Q. Byrum Hurst, Jr., for appellant. Mark Pryor, Att'y Gen., by: 0. Milton Fine II, Ass't Atey Gen., for appellee. OBERT L. BROWN, Justice, concurring. I agree to grant R the State's motion for permission to file belated brief. I am troubled, however, by the five-month gap between the filing of appellant's brief on August 16, 1999, and the tender of the State's brief on January 24, 2000, especially since the appellant apparently is in prison. 1 The State did not receive a copy of the appellant's brief after, it was filed. But the State, no doubt, did receive a copy of the briefing schedule from the Supreme Court Clerk, showing that the appellant's brief was due in August 1999. This should have alerted the State to determine whether the appellant's brief had indeed been filed. Had the State checked, this considerable delay in moving ahead on this appeal could have been avoided. ' This is a Rule 37 appeal, and in order to file a Rule 37 petition, a petitioner must be in custody. See Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1; Bohanan v. State, 336 Ark. 367, 985 S.W2d 708 (1999).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.