DUGAL LOGGING, INC. V. ARKANSAS PULPWOOD CO. 546 Cite as 335 Ark. 546 (1998) [335 DUGAL LOGGING, INC. v. ARKANSAS PULPWOOD COMPANY, INC., et al. 98-973 983 S.W.2d 126 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered December 21, 1998 APPEAL & ERROR - CERTIFICATION OF CASE TO SUPREME COURT - LIMITED CERTIFICATION GRANTED. - Where the supreme court determined that certification was proper on the issue of whether a motion to extend the time for filing the record was properly granted because determination of this issue involves the interpretation and application of Ark. R. App. P.—Civ. 5 and could result in dismissal of the appeal as requested by several of the appellants, the supreme
DUGAL LOGGING, INC. V. ARKANSAS PULPWOOD Co. ARK.] Cite as 335 Ark. 546 (1998) 547 court accepted certification from the court of appeals on this question only. Certification to the Arkansas Supreme Court; granted. Vickery & Landers, PLLC, by: Michael R. Landers; and Bur-bank, Dodson & McDonald, by: Gary D. McDonald, for appellants. Harrell & Lindsey, P.A., by: Paul E. Lindsey, for appellees. ER CURIAM. [1] On October 23, 1998, the court of p appeals certified this matter to this court because it found that the case presented a question pertaining to interpretation of a rule. After reviewing the briefs filed by the parties, we have determined certification is proper on the issue of whether a motion to extend the time for filing the record was properly granted. Because determination of this issue involves the interpretation and application of Ark. R. App. P.—Civ. 5 and may result in dismissal of the appeal as requested by several of the appellants, we accept certification on this question only.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.