ARK.] GARNER V. STATE. 487 GARNER V. STATE. Opinion delivered January 7, 1905. CARNAL ABUSE — SUFFIC1ENCY OF INDICTMENT. — An indictment for carnal abuse, which alleges that defendant "feloniously did carnally know and abuse one A, the said A then and there being a female under the age of 16 years, against the peace," etc , is sufficient without alleging that said A was not the wife of defendant. Appeal from Garland Circuit Court. ALEXANDER M. DUFFIE, Judge. Affirmed.
488 GARNER v. STATE. [73 M. S. Cobb, for appellant. The indictment was insuf ficient. Whar. Cr. Pl. § 241. When the negative is descriptive of the offense, it must be alleged in the indictment. Bish. Cr. Pro. § § 633-637; 17 Wall. 168; 47 L. R. A. 144; 37 Ark. 96; 19 Ark. 143, 566; 16 Ark. 567. George IV. Murphy, Attorney General, for appellee. The indictment, being substantially in the words of the statute, is sufficient. 1 Bish. New Cr. Pro. § 613; 108 Ind. 47; 48 Ark. 66; 64 Ark. 467; 61 Ark. 62. BATTLE, J. Is the following indictment,. omitting caption, sufficient : "The grand jury of Garland County, in the name and by the authority of the State of Arkansas, accuse Tom Garner of the crime of carnal abuse, committed as follows, towit, the said Torn Garner, in the county and State aforesaid, on the. 20th day of February, A. D. 1904, feloniously did carnally know and abuse one Ada Tucker, the said Ada Tucker then and there being a female under the age of sixteen years, against the peace and dignity of the State of Arkansas?" It is contended that this indictment is defective, because it does not allege that Ada Tucker was not the wife of the defendant. This is not necessary. The allegation that he "feloniously did carnally know and abuse" her negatives such an idea. This allegation could not be true if they were husband and wife. The indictment contains "a statement of the acts constituting the offense, in ordinary and concise language, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended" (Kirby's Dig., § 2243) ; and is sufficient. Judgment affirmed. McCuLLOCH, J., did not participate.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.