ARK.] FOUST V. BLEVINS. 897 FOUST V. BLEVINS. Opinion delivered December 7, 1931. .Brus AND NOTES—WARRANTY OF CAPACITY OF PARTIES.—One who negotiates a note by delivery without indorsement is liable under the implied warranty of capacity of the parties where a surety on the note was an infant (Crawford & Moses' Dig., § 7831, subdivision 3). Appeal from Izard Circuit Court; John L. Bledsoe, Judge; reversed. Oscar E. Ellis, W . F. Smith and F. W. Benbrook, for app ellant. J. Paul Ward and T. R. Wilson, for appellee. HUMPHREYS, J. The judgment of dismissal appealed from ill this cause was rendered by the circuit court of Izard County, sitting as a jury on appeal from the court of a justice of the peace. Appellant alleged that she traded a mule to appellee for a note executed tO him or bearer, by Owen Hively and Jeff Hively, in the sum of $33, which he delivered to her without indorsement, before maturity, upon which he was and is liable as a warrantor under subdivision 3 of § 7831, Crawford & Moses' Digest, which, in part, reads as follows: "Every person negotiating an instrument by delivery or by a qualified indorsement, warrants: * * * (3) That all prior parties had capacity to contract." - Appellee denied liability under said subdivision of said section. Upon the trial of the cause, it was developed by the undisputed evidence that, at the -time the note was executed, Jeff Hively was under the age of twenty-one years,
and that he signed the note as security for his brother,
Owen Hively. The development of this fact entitled appellant to a judgment . against appellee as warrantor of the payment of the note under the statute referred to as construed by this court in the case of Commercial Credit Co. v. Blanks Motor Co., 174 Ark. 274, 294 S. W. 999.
The distinction contended for by appellee between the case at bar and the case cited is not tenable. The
898 [184 instant case is controlled by the principle therein announced. On account of the error indicated the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions tO - enter judgment in favoy of appellant.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.