Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

1012 FT. SMITH SEED CO. V. JONES, SHERIFF. [198 FORT SMITH SEED COMPANY V. JONES, SHERIFF. 4-5596 132 S..W. 2d 364 Opinion delivered October 23, 1939. 1. EXECUTIONSSALE OF LANDSREDEMPTION.—Under § 5341, Pope's Digest, providing that when any real estate is sold under execution the same may be redeemed by the purchaser or his vendees within 12 months thereafter, the redemption is from the purchaser at the sale and not the sheriff. 2. EXECUTIONSMETHOD OF REDEMPTION OF REAL ESTATE.—The method of redemption provided by § 5342 of Pope's Digest is for the debtor to pay the clerk of the court from which the execution was issued the purchase money with 15 per cent, per annum and all lawful charges which is to be held by the clerk for the use of the purchaser. 3. EXECUTIONSRIGHT OF JUDGMENT CREDITOR TO MONEY FOR WHICH PROPERTY SOLD.—Where appellee, as sheriff, sold the property of R. at execution sale, and a stranger to the transaction became the purchaser, the judgment creditor was entitled to the money paid
ARK.] FT. SMITH SEED CO. V: JONES, SHERIFF. 1013 to the sheriff by the purchaser and he was not required to wait until the time for redemption expired. 4. MANbAMUS.—Where appellee, as sheriff, sold the real property of R. to satisfy a judgment against him in favor of appellant, and a third party became the purchaser, mandamus was, on appel-lee's . refusal to pay the money over to appellant, the proper remedy; and, since there is no "provision in the statute for redeeming land sold under execution, from the sheriff it was immaterial that the time for redemption had not expired. Appeal from Polk Circuit Court ; Minor W. Millwee, Judge; reversed. J. F. Quillin, for appellant. HUMPHREYS, J. On April 19, 1932, appellant, a corporation, obtained a judgment against Albert Robert-son and Maye Robertson for $294.40 in the circuit court of Polk county, on appeal from a magistrate's court in said county. On September 23, 1938, an execution was issued upon the judgment and levied upon lands belonging to Albert Robertson and Maye Robertson described as follows, to-wit : Lot 27 in Hornbeck Place Addition, and lots, 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Reeves' Subdivision of lot. 28 of said Horn-beck Place Addition to the city of Mena, Arkansas. On October 15, 1938, said lands were sold under the execution pursuant to law by W. E. Jones, sheriff of the county, and purchased by J. B. Wallace, Sr., the highest bidder, for $326, which amount was insufficient to pay the judgment and aecrued interest and costs. The lands were sold on 'a credit of three' months and on January 16, 1939, the purchaser paid the total amount of his bid to the sheriff, whereupon, appellant requested the sheriff to pay said sum to it less costs, which he refused to do without an order of the court. Thereupon appellant filed a petition in said court for a writ of mandamus to compel the sheriff : to pay the proceeds of the sale . of the lands to it to apply on its judgment. Summons was issued on the petition and MT . E. Jones, sheriff, accepted service of same. The petition set out all the proceedings had and done in
1014 FT. SMITH SEED CO. V. JONES, SHERIFF. [198 the case from the time suit was filed by appellant against Albert Robertson and Maye Robertson in the magistrate's court. On the 18th day of January, 1938, appellant by its attorney appeared in court and W. E. Jones, .sheriff, appeared in person and bah sides announced ready for trial. The cause was submitted to the court upon the record with the result that the court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus, to which appellant excepted and prayed an appeal Lo the Supreme Court, which was granted. The necessary . steps tO perfect its appeal having been taken the cause is before us for determination, the sole question being whether at an execution sale of real estate, when a stranger to the suit becomes the purchaser, is the sheriff required to deliver the purchase money to the execution creditor when the same is received, or is he permitted to wait until the 'time for redemption of the judgment debtor has expired? By § 5341 of Pope's Digest s it is provided that : "When any real estate, or interest therein, is sold under execution,. the same may be redeemed by the debtor from the purchaser, or his vendees, or the personal representatives of either, within twelve months thereafter." In § 5342 of Pope's Digest it is providcd that : "The debtor may, at any time within twelve months, pay to the clerk of the court where the execution issued the purchase money, with fifteen per cent., per annum, and all lawful charges, and take his receipt therefor. Such money shall be held by the clerk for the use of the purchaser, and ha shall be responsible upon his official bond therefor. Such clerk shall indorse upon the execution book that such redemption has been made." It will be observed by reference to § 5341 of Pope's Digest that the redemption . by the debtor is from the purchaser at the sale and not from the sheriff. It will be observed by reference to § 5342 of Pope's Digest that the method by which the redemption is to be effected is for the debtor to pay the clerk of the court from which the execution was issued the purchase
ARK.] 1015 money, with fifteen per cent., per annum and all lawful charges and take his receipt therefor and that the money shall be held by the clerk for the use of the purchaser and that the clerk shall be responsible upon his official bond for the money. There is no provision in the statute for the owner of the property sold under execution to redeem the land from the sheriff. The money received by the sheriff from the purchaser was for the purpose of paying the amount to the judgment creditor and upon his failure to do so a penalty is imposed upon him by § 5374 of Pope's Digest. _ The court erred in denying the writ and the cause is reversed and remanded with directions to the circuit court to grant the writ.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.