ARK.] MISSOURI PACIFIC RD. CO . V. WILLIAMSON. 487 MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY V. WILLIAMSON. 4-4909 Opinion delivered January 31, 1938. 1. RAILROADS—CONTRACTS.—Where appellee, by deed, conveyed certain land to appellant in consideration that appellant would erect thereon a depot, and proviaing that it should be held by appellant, its successors and assigns, so long and so long only as it should be used for depot purposes, and that upon cessation of such use the grantor or his assigns might re-enter and that title should revest in him, placing a box car on the land to be used for depot purposes was not a compliance with the terms of the grant, neither was the erection of a shed on the right-of-way but not on his particular land a compliance therewith; and appellees were, as heirs of tfie grantor, entitled, in ejectment, to recover the same. 2. RAILROADS—CONTRACTS—ESTOPPEL.—Where lands were deeded to appellant for depot purposes, the grantor did not, by leasing the land from appellant for several years for agricultural purposes, estop himself and heirs from requiring appellant to comply with the terms of the conveyance in order to acquire title to the land. Appeal from Crittenden Circuit Court; G. E. Keck, Judge; affirmed. Thomas B. Pryor and Harvey G. Combs, for appellant. J. F. Williamson, for appellee. HUMPHREYS, J. Appellants instituted an action of ejectment in the Crittenden circuit court against appel-lee to recover a small parcel of land in said county as follows: "From the intersecting west line of section 6, township 5 north, range 8 east, measure northeasterly along center line of carrier's main track 785 feet, thence northwesterly normal thereto 51.5 feet to a point 8.5 feet from and on the northwest side of carrier's side track No. 1 for the point of beginning; thence continue on last mentioned course 48.5 feet to a point in carrier's northerly right-of-way line, thence northeasterly normal to last course and along said right-of-way line 115 feet; thence southeasterly normal to last course 48.5 feet to a point 8.5 feet from and on the northwest side of said track No. 1; thence southwesterly parallel to said track 115 feet fo the point of beginning, containing 5,577.5 square
488 iMissovni PACIFIC RD. CO . V. WILLIAMSON. [195 feet." This parcel of land lies :within the second parcel of land described in a donation deed executed by J. F: Williamson in 1903 to the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company for station and depot purposes. It .is specifically provided .in the deed that thq. last two tracts described are conveyed for station and depot purposes, and to be held by the grantee, its 'successors and assigns, so long • and so' long only as they may be . used'fOr such station and depot purposes, and upon cessation Of such use the grantor or his assigns may re-enter, and title of said land shall then, at once, revest in him. • Appellants -alleged ownership of the land for which they brought suit under and by virtue of the J. F.. Wil-liamson donation - deed and that all conditions embraced in the deed had been fully performed. Appellee filed 'RR .6.ns -Wer denying that appellants owned the land in ques'tiOn for the reason that appellant&, never built 'a station or depot upon either of the two tracts described in the deed from J. F. Williamson to the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway -Company and on account of 'such failure never acquired title to said land; and further that the box car placed upon ;the right-of-way and used for a station. or depot in. 19 . 14,- eleven years after the deed was executed and filed for . record, burned down in 1919 and was never replaced and that the shed it constructed a few hundred yards from where the box car was placed was not on any of the land described in the Williamson deed. Appellee also alleged that after the. death of J. F. Wil-, . liamson he became the owner in fee simple of the south, west quarter of section 6 by inheritance, entered. into the possession thereof and is now in the rightful possession thereof. On May 3, 1937, a jury trial was held, resulting in an instructed verdict for appellee. As we understand the record, no station . or depot was ever erected' upon any part or parcel of the lands eonveyed by J. F. Williamson to the railway .company. We .. certainly can not be mistaken about the matter as /
ARK.] MISSOURI PACIFIC RD. CO . V. WILLIAMSON. 489 Mr. Wheeler who represented appellant stated that for the purpose of expediting matters it has'been stipnlated that there never was : any depot built in- section 6: The only attempt to cotaply with this condition in the deed,- if, indeed, it was an attempt to do so, was to place an old box car on 'the right-of-way which was conveyed . in the same deed that thelands for station and depot purposes were conveyed. This court said in St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Berry, 86 Ark. 309, 110 S. W. 1049, quoting the tourth . syllabus . of the opinion, that : • "A contract to establish a .`depOt' on certain land is not complied with by constructing a side track and placing a box car where freight may be received and cars stopped when flagged; the term 'depot' implying a permanent structure to be used as a receptacle for freight and passengers and to be of the kind usually erected at similar stations along the same railroad." The side track was not built upon any of the land conveyed for station and depot purposes in the William-son deed, but was placed upon the right-of-way, or the hundred-foot strip, which was conveyed as a right-of-way for railrbad purposes. After the -box-car bnrned a—shed was erected in . 1921 across the highway on land to the west and situated in another . section and range and was used for receiving and• storing freight and receiving and discharging passengers, :but this did not meet the condition in the WilliamSon deed that the tWe Parcels of land should be used for. station and depot , purpoSes nor the express provision in the deed that the two last above mentioned tracts are conveyed . for station and depot pur-. poses, and to be held by the grantee, its successors and assigns so long and so long only as_ they may be used for such station and depot purposes and . upon cessation of such use the grantor or'his assignS may re-enter, and title of Said land shall 'then at once revest in him. We do not think the fact that J. F. Williathsen leased a f)"att of the• two last mentioned; tracts froM the railroad company for several years :, for- ••agricultural:'Puilioses -estOpped him or his' heirs friMi . -requiring the -railroad
490 [195 cOmpany to comply with conditions in the donation deed in order to acquire the title to the land. We think the record clearly shows that the railroad company either failed to acquire title to the last two tracts of land by complying with the conditions in the deed in order to acquire title, or else the railroad company abandoned all right and title thereto after accepting the deed. The instaM case is quite similar to the case of St. Louis Southwestern By. Co. v. Curtis, 113 Ark. 92, 167 S. W. 489, and the principles announced therein are applicable to the instant case. Under the rules announced in that case, we think the judgment in the instant case is correct. The judgment is affirmed.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.