Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

HAWTHORNE V. STATE Atu‹..] Cite as 330 Ark. 93 (1997) 93 Johnny Ray HAWTHORNE v. STATE of Arkansas CR 97-1021 950 S.W.2d 806 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 2, 1997 1. APPEAL & ERROR MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the filing of the notice of appeal was premature due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for belated appeal. 2. APPEAL & ERROR APPELLANT NOT PREJUDICED BY DELAY MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED. Where the supreme court granted the motion for belated appeal filed by appellant's attorney, appellant was not prejudiced by the delay; accordingly appellant's pro se motion for_ appointment of counsel and rule on the clerk were denied.
HAWTHORNE V. STATE 94 Cite as 330 Ark. 93 (1997) [330 Motion for Belated Appeal; granted; Motion for Appointment of Counsel and Rule on the Clerk; denied. John F. Stroud, III, for appellant. No response. PER CURIAM. [1] Appellant, Johnny Ray Hawthorne, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. We treat this motion as a motion for belated appeal. His attorney, John F. Stroud, III, admits in his motion that the filing of the notice of appeal was premature due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion for belated appeal is therefore granted. [2] Appellant has also filed a pro se motion for appointment of counsel and rule on the clerk. Because we are granting his attorney's motion for belated appeal, we find that appellant has not been prejudiced by this delay. We accordingly deny this motion for appointment of counsel and rule on the clerk. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.