ARK.] 363 Raymond SANDERS v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 97-679 952 S.W.2d 133 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered July 7, 1997 1. APPEAL & ERROR - POSTCONVICTION RELIEF - ORIGINAL ATTORNEY OBLIGATED TO CONTINUE REPRESENTATION AND TO LODGE RECORD. - Had petitioner had been proceeding pro se throughout his A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37 proceeding, or had the record reflected that the attorney who filed the original Rule 37 petition had been relieved as counsel, the supreme court would not have hesitated to find that petitioner, who did not tender the Rule 37 record in a timely manner, had failed to exercise diligence in pursuing the appeal; because, however, he was not proceeding pro se orginally, his attorney was obligated to obtain a ruling on the Rule 37 petition and remain as petitioner's attorney until relieved by the trial court or the supreme court; even though petitioner filed an pro se amended petition and a pro se notice of appeal, his attorney had not been relieved and was thus obligated to continue representing him, which included lodging the Rule 37 record. 2. APPEAL & ERROR - POSTCONVICTION RELIEF - APPEAL OF ORDER DENYING - APPELLATE RULE PROVIDING FOR CONTINUED REPRESENTATION OF COUNSEL APPLICABLE. - Rule 16 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure—Criminal, which provides that counsel, whether retained or court-appointed, shall continue to represent a convicted defendant throughout any appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court, unless permitted by the trial court or the supreme court to withdraw, applies to appeals of or ders denying postconviction relief. 3. APPEAL & ERROR - MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK GRANTED. — Where another attorney had undertaken to represent petitioner pro bono, the supreme court accepted his appearance as counsel, relieved the attorney who filed the original Rule 37 petition, and granted the motion for rule on clerk. Pro Se Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.
SANDERS V. STATE
3A4 rite nc 329 Ark. 363 (19971 [329 Petitioner, pro se. No response. PER CURIAM. Raymond Sanders was found guilty of capital felony murder in the death of Frederick LaSalle and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. We affirmed the judgment. Sanders v. State, 310 Ark. 510, 838 S.W.2d 359 (1992). The mandate was issued October 23, 1992. On December 4, 1992, Tona M. DeMers, counsel for Sanders, filed in the trial court a petition pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37 challenging the judgment. On October 1, 1996, Sanders filed a pro se amended petition under Rule 37. There is no order in the record relieving DeMers as counsel and nothing which explains why the original petition remained pending for nearly four years. The trial court entered an order on October 10, 1996, declaring the Rule 37 petition to be untimely and dismissing it. A timely pro se notice of appeal was filed by Sanders on November 8, 1996. The record was not tendered to this court within ninety days as required by Rule 5(a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, and Sanders, by his attorney Jeff Rosenzweig who is representing him pro bono, now seeks a rule on clerk to have the record lodged belatedly. [1, 2] The sole issue before us at this juncture is whether petitioner Sanders has established good cause for the failure to lodge the record in a timely manner. If petitioner had been proceeding pro se throughout the Rule 37 proceeding, or if the record reflected that the attorney who filed the original Rule 37 petition had been relieved as counsel, we would not hesitate to find that petitioner had failed to exercise diligence in pursuing the appeal. He was, however, not proceeding pro se orginally, and his attorney, Tona M. DeMers, was obligated to obtain a ruling on the Rule 37 petition and remain as petitioner's attorney until relieved by the trial court or this court. Rule 16 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure—Criminal provides that counsel, whether retained or court-appointed, shall continue to represent a convicted defendant
ARK.] 365 throughout any appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court, unless permitted by the trial court or this court to withdraw. The rule applies to appeals of orders denying postconviction relief. Miller v. State, 299 Ark. 548, 775 S.W.2d 79 (1989). Even though petitioner Sanders filed an pro se amended petition and a pro se notice of appeal, his attorney had not been relieved and was thus obligated to continue representing him, which included lodging the Rule 37 record here. [3] Because attorney Jeff Rosenzweig has undertaken to represent Sanders pro bono, we will accept his appearance as counsel and relieve Ms. DeMers. The motion for rule on clerk is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Motion granted.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.