142 [328 Wiley GRUBBS v. CREDIT GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY 96-889 942 S.W.2d 249 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 14, 1997 ATTORNEY & CLIENT - MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES ON APPEAL DENIED - AWARD PREMATURE. - The supreme court concluded that an award of attorneys' fees before recovery against the insurer under the policy was premature, there having been no recovery by appellant but only a remand for further proceedings; appellant was entitled to the costs of his successful appeal under Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 6-7(b), but the costs of appeal did not include attorneys' fees; the motion was denied without prejudice to raise the issue of attorneys' fees if appellant proved successful in recovering under the policy. Motion for Attorney Fees on Appeal; denied. Callis L. Childs, for appellant. Wright, Lindsey &Jennings, by: Kathryn A. Pryor and Kristi M. Moody, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant Wiley Grubbs moves this court for attorney fees in the amount of $9,268.75, following his successful appeal in this case. See Grubbs v. Credit Gen. Ins. Co., 327 Ark. 479, 939 S.W.2d 290 (1997). In that case, which involved an insurance claim by Grubbs against Credit General, we reversed an order of summary judgment entered in favor of Credit General and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. The two attorneys for Grubbs have attached affidavits to the motion for attorney fees, attesting to their respective fees and further attached affidavits from third-party attorneys, attesting to the reasonableness of the hourly rates charged. Grubbs cites Ark. Code Ann. § 23-79-208 (Repl. 1992), as authority for collecting these attorney fees from an insurance company. Credit General responds that awarding attorney fees is premature because attorney fees under § 23-79-208 are awarded when the judgment amount against the insurer is within 20 per-
Aruc] 143 cent of the amount claimed. No judgment has been entered in this matter. Credit General further contends that the amount claimed is excessive and that this litigation is a third-party subroga-tion action to which § 23-79-208 does not apply. [1] We do not reach the issues of the alleged excessiveness of the fees or application of 5 23-79-208 to third-party claims because we agree with Credit General that an award of attorney fees before recovery under the policy is premature. There has been no recovery by Grubbs at this stage but only a remand for further proceedings. Grubbs is entitled to the costs of his successful appeal under Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 6-7(b), but the costs of appeal do not include attorney fees. The motion is denied without prejudice to raise the issue of attorney fees, if Grubbs is successful in recovering under the policy. GLAZE, J., not participating.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.