Aluc] 141 Antonio BRITT v. STATE of Arkansas CR 97-200 942 S.W.2d 251 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 14, 1997 APPEAL & ERROR - MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL DENIED. — Where the attorney for appellant filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, stating that it would be in the best interest of all concerned and that another attorney had expressed an interest in handling the case, the supreme court, noting that no motion to appoint substitute counsel had been filed on behalf of appellant, denied the motion. Motion to Withdraw as Counsel; denied. Ronald C. Wilson, for appellant. No response. PER CURIAM. Ronald C. Wilson, attorney for appellant, Antonio Britt, has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel, stating that it would be in the best interest of all concerned. The motion further states that another attorney, Don Forrest, has expressed an interest in handling the case. However, as of this date, no motion to appoint substitute counsel has been filed on behalf of appellant. [1] The motion is, therefore, denied.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.