258 DUDLEY V. STATE [287 Cite as 287 Ark. 258 (1985) Oliver DUDLEY v. STATE of Arkansas CR 85-183 697 S.W.2d 912 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 28, 1985 APPEAL & ERROR — WRIT OF CERTIORARI GRANTED. — Where the petition contains allegations that the court reporter has refused to transcribe the trial testimony, the petition for writ of certiorari to complete the record was granted and the matter referred to the Supreme Court Board of Certified Court Reporters. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to Complete the Record; granted. Law Offices of Jim Lyons, by: Scott Emerson and Scott Davidson, for appellant. Steve Clark, Att'y Gen., by: Theodore Holder, Asst. Att'y Gen., for appellee. PER CURIAM. []1] Appellant's petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Because the petition contains allegations that the court reporter, Ms. Ralphalene Forbis, has refused to transcribe the trial testimony, we are referring this matter to the committee on Supreme Court Board of Certified Court Reporters for whatever action it may deem appropriate. PURTLE, J., not participating.
ARK.] 259 Avery Nathan RICHARDSON v. STATE of Arkansas 697 S.W.2d 913 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 28, 1985 APPEAL & ERROR - MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK - GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. - An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk. Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted. Carl J. Madsen, for appellant. Steve Clark, Att'y Gen., by: Theodore Holder, Asst. Att'y Gen., for appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant, Avery Nathan Richardson, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Carl J. Madsen, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. [I] We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeal in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. PURTLE, J., not participating.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.