ARK.] 197 George HICKEY v. STATE of Arkansas CR 85-154 697 S.W.2d 118 SupreMe Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 14, 1985 1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - FAILURE TO RAISE SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE ISSUE ON APPEAL - CANNOT BE RAISED IN POSTCONVIC-TION PROCEEDING. - A petitioner may not reach the question of sufficiency of the evidence in a postconviction proceeding by arguing that counsel shoud have raised the issue on appeal. 2. APPEAL & ERROR - SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE - CHALLENGES MUST BE MADE IN TRIAL COURT AND ON APPEAL. — Challenges to the weight and sufficiency of the evidence are a direct attack on the judgment which must be made in the trial court and, if warranted, on the record on appeal. 3. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - POSTCONVICTION RELIEF - LIMITATIONS. - Postconviction relief is limited to grounds sufficient to void the judgment or open it to collateral attack. 4. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - CHALLENGE TO SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE NOT COGNIZABLE UNDER RULE 37, A.R.Cr.P. - A challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is not cognizable under Rule 37, A.R.Cr.P., even when the petitioner frames his attack on the evidence in an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel. Pro Se Petition to Proceed in the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, First Division, pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37; petition denied. Appellant, pro se. No response. PER CURIAM. Petitioner George Hickey was found guilty by a jury of kidnapping, rape and robbery. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of ten and twenty years for kidnapping and rape and an additional term of ten years for robbery to be served consecutively to those terms. He appealed the kidnapping conviction only, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Hickey v. State, 14 Ark. App. 50, 684 S.W.2d 830 (1985). Petitioner now seeks permission to proceed in circuit court for postconviction relief pursuant to A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37 on the sole ground that he was denied effective assistance of counsel on appeal. He bases the allegation on the decision of his appellate counsel to challenge
198 HICKEY V. STATE [287 Cite as 287 Ark. 197 (1985) only the sufficiency of the evidence to support the kidnapping conviction. Petitioner contends that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of any of the three offenses, kidnapping, rape or robbery. [11-3] Just as a petitioner may not use our postconviction rule as a means to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence on the allegation that counsel's failure to move for a directed verdict amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel, Guy v. State, 282 Ark. 424,668 S.W.2d 952 (1984), a petitioner may not reach the sufficiency of the evidence by arguing that counsel should have raised the issue on appeal. Challenges to the weight and sufficiency of the evidence are a direct attack on the judgment which must be made in the trial court and, if warranted, on the record on appeal. McCroskey v. State, 278 Ark. 156, 644 S.W.2d 271 (1983). Postconviction relief is limited to grounds sufficient to void the judgment or open it to collateral attack. Clines v. State, 282 Ark. 541, 669 S.W.2d 883 (1984). [4] If we were to permit a petitioner to reopen the question of the sufficiency of the evidence under the guise of a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, Rule 37 would become an extension of the direct appeal. We have consistently held that a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is not cognizable under Rule 37. Pride v. State, 285 Ark. 89, 684 S.W.2d 819 (1985); Jones v. State, 283 Ark. 363,767 S.W.2d 738 (1984); Williams V. State, 280 Ark. 543, 659 S.W.2d 948 (1983); Pitcock v. State, 279 Ark. 174,649 S.W.2d 393 (1983); Swisher v . State, 257 Ark. 24, 514 S.W.2d 218 (1974); Cox v. State, 243 Ark. 60, 418 S.W.2d 799 (1967). We will adhere to that view of the rule even when the petitioner frames his attack on the evidence in an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel. Petition denied. PURTLE, J., not participating.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.