SAUNDERS V. WILDER BROS. SAWMILL, INC. 306 Cite as 372 Ark. 306 (2008) [372 Dianna Page SAUNDERS v. WILDER BROTHERS SAWMILL, INC., Bobby D. Davis and Len Pitts 07-1249 275 S.W3d 158 Supreme Court ofArkansas Opinion delivered February 7, 2008 COURTS — REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF CERTIFIED QUESTION TO BE WITHDRAWN GRANTED. — Where the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas requested the supreme court to consider the district court's request for review of a certified question withdrawn, the supreme court granted the request and dismissed the certified question. Request to Withdraw Certified Question; request granted, certified question dismissed.
Attic.] 307 ER CURIAIVI. [1] We recently accepted a certified ques- p tion from the United States District Court for the Eastern District ofArkansas. See Saunders v. Wilder Bros. Sawmill, Inc., 372 Ark. 48, 269 S.W.3d 812 (2007) (per curiam). On December 18, 2007, Petitioner moved to dismiss, stating no controversy exists. We denied the motion and noted that the matter was certified to us by the District Court, not the Petitioner, and it was incumbent upon the District Court to withdraw the certified question. See Saunders v. Wilder Bros. Sawmill, Inc., 372 Ark. 185, 271 S.W.3d 522 (2008) (per curiam). Now we have a request from the District Court to consider the request for review withdrawn. Request granted; certified question dismissed. IMBER, J., not participating.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.