Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

ARK.] NORMAN V. STATE 447 Cite as 323 Ark. 447 (1996) Dinzel NORMAN v. STATE of Arkansas CR 95-361 916 S.W.2d 724 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 12, 1996 CONTEMPT COUNSEL DIRECTED TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT. Appellant's attorney was directed to appear before the supreme court and show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this court for failure to file appellant's brief in accordance with the court's Per Curiam Order of April 24, 1995. Pro Se Motion and Amended Motion for Rule on the Clerk; Newton Circuit Court; Robert McCorkindale, Judge; Order issued. Pro se. [1] PER CURIAM. George Stone, attorney for appellant, is directed to appear before this court on February 26, 1996, at 9 a.m. and show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this court for failure to file the appellant's brief in accordance with this court's Per Curiam Order of April 24, 1995.
448 [323 Order Issued.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.