ARK.] 39 Bobby BRATTON v. Jim Guy TUCKER, et al. 91-161 816 S.W.2d 888 Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered October 21, 1991 APPEAL & ERROR - CLERK DIRECTED TO DISMISS PETITION AND ACCEPT NO FURTHER FILINGS. - Under the circumstances of this case where the appeal was dismissed but appellant continued to file numerous petitions that were without merit and that were burdensome to the administrative affairs of the court, the clerk was directed to dismiss the error coram nobis petition and to accept no further filings by appellant with reference to this case. Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis; denied. Art Dodrill, for appellant. Ken Cook and James L. Glover, for appellee. PER CURIAM. This case was initially filed in the Arkansas Court of Appeals and involves a second appeal. On June 3, 1991, the appellant filed a motion in the court of appeals asking that this case be certified to the Arkansas Supreme Court. See Bobby Bratton v. Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Jackson and Tucker, 302 Arkansas 308, 788 S.W.2d 955 (1990). Motions to dismiss were also filed in the court of appeals by various appellees. On June 19, 1991, the appellant's "motion to certify the Supreme Court, to remand and to stay brief time," as well as all other motions filed by the parties in the court of appeals, were certified to this court. The various appellees again filed motions to dismiss. The motions of all parties were submitted to this court on June 24, 1991; on July 1, 1991, the appellees' motions to dismiss the appeal were granted, and the appellant's motion to remand and to stay briefing time was declared moot. [1] Subsequent to this July 1, 1991, order of dismissal, the appellant has filed petitions for "reconsideration" and a "motion to recall order." On July 15, 1991, the appellant's requests were denied. The appellant continues to file pleadings in this court such as this petition for writ of error coram nobis, which are without merit and which are burdensome to the administrative affairs of
40 [307 the court. The clerk is therefore directed to dismiss this petition for writ of error coram nobis and to accept no further filings by Bobby Bratton with reference to proceedings involving Case No. 91-161, regarding Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Jackson and Tucker, Jim Guy Tucker, et al. IT IS SO ORDERED. BROWN, J., not participating.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.