128 [355 Raymond WALTERS v. STATE of Arkansas CR 03-1041 132 S.W3d 218 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered November 20, 2003 APPEAL & ERROR - MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY ON DIRECT APPEAL - GRANTED. - Where counsel's motion stated that he was provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary, the supreme court granted his motion to withdraw as attorney and substituted another in the matter. Motion to Withdraw as Attorney on Direct Appeal; granted. Mark S. Fraiser, for appellant. No response. ER CURIAM. Mark S. Fraiser, a full time, state-salaried p public defender for the Eighteenth Judicial District East, was appointed by the trial court to represent Appellant, Raymond Walters, an indigent defendant, on the charge of rape, a Class Y Felony. Following a trial, Walters was convicted of the charge and sentenced to life imprisonment. A notice of appeal was timely filed and the record has been timely lodged in this court. Mr. Fraiser now asks to be relieved as counsel for Appellant in this criminal appeal, based on the case of Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000) (holding that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal) and Tester v. State, 341 Ark. 281, 16 S.W.3d 227 (2000) (per curiam) (relieving Appellant's court-appointed public defender and appointing new counsel on appeal). Since the time of those decisions, however, the law was changed by the General Assembly. Act 1370 of 2001 provides in part: "Persons employed as full-time public defenders who are not provided a state-funded secretary may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Arkansas Supreme Court or the Arkansas Court of Appeals." That provision is now codified as Ark. Code Ann. ยง 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2001).
ARK.] 129 [1] Mr. Fraiser's motion states that he is provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary. Accordingly, we grant his motion to withdraw as attorney. Mr. Steven R. Smith will be substituted as attorney for Appellant in this matter. The Clerk will establish a new briefing schedule.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.