CHILDERS v. ARKANSAS DEFT OF HuIvIAN SERVS ARK] Cite as 361 Ark 227 (2005) 227 Sherry CHILDERS v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT of HUMAN SERVICES 05-30 20; S W3d 795 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion dehvered March 24, 2005 APPEAL & ERROR — REMAND FOR DETERMINATION OF ATTORNEY ERROR — Where the record was not timely filed, appellant's counsel was ordered to file a no-ment bnef, an affidavit of waiver, or an affidavit of mdigency and a wnt of certiorari to complete the record, the complete record was tendered on February 14, 2005, but the fee bill for the record indicated the record was complete on April 16, 2004, that the $408 50 transcript costs were to be paid by the State, and that the remaining $100 50, which represented the circuit clerk's fee, was "uncollectable", and appellant's counsel on February 22, 2005, filed a motion to accept record and set bnefmg schedule, but the motion did not indicate why the record was not secured from the circuit clerk and filed before the deadline, as extended, of June 4, 2004, the record was insufficient to decide fault, and the question of attorney error was remanded to the trial court to make a finding of fact and submit the findings within sixty days, the appellate court clerk was directed to file the complete record and set a bnefing schedule
CHIL1JERS 1', ARLA.NSAS DEP' 1 uk- HUMPONI SERVS 218 Cite as 361 Ark 227 (2005) [361 Motion to Accept Record and Set Bnefing Schedule; granted, issue of attorney error remanded Dale Arnold, for appellant No response. ER CURIAM: This case is an appeal from an order entered P by the Sebastian County Circuit Court, Fort Smith Dis-tnct, Juvenile Division, on December 18, 2003, terminating the parental rights of Appellant Sherry Childers. Counsel appointed by the circuit court to represent Ms: Childers filed a timely notice of appeal on January 15, 2004, and an order extending the time to file the record until June 4, 2004, was entered by the circuit court: See Ark. R. App P — Civ. 5(b). The time granted for the extension passed, and the record was not timely filed with our clerk: See Ark. R. App: P. — Civ_ 5(a) (2004). Eventually, on January 7, 2005, the Department of Human Services (DHS) filed a partial record along with its motion to dismiss the appeal. Ark: R. App. P. — Civ: 5(c) (2004): On February 3, 2005, we issued a per curiam, directing Ms. Childers's attorney to proceed with the appeal by (1) filing a no-merit brief, as established in Linker-Flores v. Ark. Dept. of Human Services, 359 Ark. 131, 194 S W 3d 739 (2004); ( 1 ) filing an affidavit of waiver; or (3) filing an affidavit of indigency and a writ of certiorari to complete the record, pursuant to Bogachoff v, Arkansas Dept: of Human Services, 360 Ark: 259, 200 S W.3d 884 (2005). The complete record was tendered to the clerk on February 14, 2005 The fee bill for the record (prepared by the circuit clerk) indicates that the record was completed on April 16, 2004: The fee bill further indicates that the transcript costs, totaling $408.50, was to be paid by the State, and that the remaining $100.50, which represents the circuit clerk's fee, was "uncollectable:" On Febru-ary 22, 2005, Childers's attorney filed a motion to accept record and set briefing schedule: The motion does not indicate why the record was not secured from the circuit clerk and filed before the deadline, as extended, of June 4, 2004: [1] In the context of a belated appeal by an indigent-criminal defendant, we no longer require an affidavit of fault before we will decide motions for rule on the clerk and motions for belated appeals: Moore v: State, 359 Ark. 370, 197 S.W.3d 447 (2004) This court will either decide the matter of fault where the record is sufficient to reach a conclusion, or:
ARK] 229 Where a motion seeking rehef from failure to perfect an appeal is filed, and it is not plain from the motion, affidavits, and record whether there is attorney error, the clerk of this court will be ordered to accept the notice of appeal or record and the appeal will proceed without delay: However, the matter of attorney error will be remanded to the trial court to make findings of fact Upon receipt by this court of the findings, this court will render a decision on attorney error. Moore v. State, supra (quoting McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W 3d 883 (2004)_ We have previously afforded indigent parents appealing from a termination of parental rights similar protections as those afforded indigent criminal defendants. Bogachoff v. Arkansas Dept, of Human Services, supra; Linker-Flores v. Ark. Dept. of Human Services, supra. Applying the McDonald principles to the present case, we conclude that the record is insufficient to decide the issue of fault, and we remand the question of attorney error to the tnal court to make findings of fact and submit the findings to this court within the next sixty days. We further direct the clerk of this court to file the complete record and set a bnefing schedule. Motion granted; issue of attorney error remanded.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.