Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

ARK I 111 Floyd G. VILLINES, III, County Judge, et aL Nora HARRIS 04-568 204 S.W3d 520 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered March 3. 2005 [Rehearing denied June 23, 2005.] APPEAL & ERROR ADDENDUM DEFICIENT REBRIEFING ORDERED, In violation of Ark Sup Ct, R 4-2(4(8), the notice of appeal was not included in the Addendum; pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), the supreme court found that the Addendum was deficient, and appellant was granted fifteen days within which to file an amended Addendum; it is a practical impossibility for seven justices to examine a single transcript filed with the court; further, the supreme court may affirm the judgment under Ark. R. Sup Ct. 4-2(b)(3) dm amended Addendum is not filed within the fifteen days. Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court; John S. Patterson, Judge, rebriefing ordered. Pulaski County Attorney's Office, by: Karla M. Burnett and Amanda M, Mitchell, for appellants_ Dover, Dixon & Horne PLLC, by: Thomas S, Stone and Nona M. Morris, for appellee_ ER CURIAM [1] Floyd Villines, III, appeals from "all p orders entered in this case" involving alleged improper assessment of real property taxes in Pulaski County. However, in violaton of Ark Sup_ Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8). the notice of appeal is not included in the Addendum. Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the Addendum is deficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended Addendum. It is a practical impossibility for seven justices to examine a single transcript filed with this court. City of Dover v City of Russellville, 351 Ark, 557, 95 S.W.3d 808 (2003). Further, this court may affirm the judgment under Ark. R. Sup. Ct. 4-2(b) (3) if an amended Addendum is not filed within the fifteen days. Special Jusnces EDWARD MORGAN, HANI HASHEM. and ELDON COFFMAN join: Ct p m, IIPOWI.L intl Nun , , not to:nth-waling
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.