15,1 [363 JacquelvneVELCOFF y: STATE of Arkansas CR 05-050 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 6, 2005 1 APPEAL & ERROR — MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL GRANTED — Where appellant's tnal counsel was never relieved as counsel, and where the tnal court entered a nunc pto tunc order appointing a second counsel based on a "letter dated March 3, 2005," but no such letter or notice of appeal was in the record thus vitiating the appointment of second counsel, the motion for belated appeal was granted and new counsel will be appointed after the proper procedures for determining indigcncy are followed MOTIONS — MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ON APPEAL GRANTED -- The record does not Cdritain a— motion for extension of time for the court reporter to prepare the transcript or the circuit court's order filed August 22, 2005, granting the motion, so the motion to supplement the record on appeal was granted with directions that the record bc supplemented bv the motion and order. 3 ATTORNEY & CLIENT — FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY REPRESENT CLIENT — Because of trial counsel's failure to adequately represent his client on appeal, a copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct Motion for Belated Appeal and Motion to Supplement the Record on Appeal, granted Ah7n Schay, for appellant No response ER CURIAM. Appellant's retained counsel at trial was Dar- p rell Brown On February 25, 2005, she was tried and convicted of twenty counts of rape and sentenced by a jury to 168 months' impnsonment on each count The judgment was entered on March 3, 2005 Attorney Brown did not tile a nonce of appeal on behalf of his client, and he was not dismissed as the attorney for appellant In an order dated and filed Apnl 15, 2003, the circuit judge found that defendant's request for a transcript of court proceedings
VELCOFF V: STATE ARK Cite as 30 Ark 454 (2005) 455 was well taken: The judge approved the request and recognized defendant's request to proceed in forma pauperis, The record before us does not contain defendant's request for a transcript or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. On May 25, 2005, the circuit judge entered an order nunc pro tunc for March 3, 2005, appointing Alvin Schay to represent the defendant: The order states, "The defendant filed a timely notice of appeal by letter dated March 3, 2005." However, there is no notice of appeal in the record: Accordingly, we will not accept as valid the order entered nunc pro tunc by the circuit judge Further, although the record contains letters from the appellant to the circuit judge which clearly express appellant's desire to appeal her case, there is no letter from appellant dated March 3. 2005. asking that her convictions be appealed: On August 30, 2005, Mr: Schay, acting now as pro hono counsel, prepared and filed a motion for belated appeal in this case In that motion, he states that he attempted to file the record in this matter with the Arkansas Supreme Court Clerk on August 24, 2005 The next day he was advised by our clerk that there was no adequate notice of appeal and that the circuit court's appointment of Mr_ Schay was not valid, Mr: Schay adds that he does not desire to be appointed appellate counsel b y this court: This case was essentially abandoned by Darrell Brown. Disciplinary action was taken against Mr Brown by the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct on other matters, and his license was suspended on April 29, 2005 [1] We grant the motion for belated appeal: Because Mr. Brown was never relieved as counsel and because this court does not recognize as valid the order by the circuit court appointing Mr. Schay as attorney for the appellant, another attorney will be appointed to represent appellant after the proper procedures for determining indigency are followed. As required by Ark: Sup: Ct. R. 6-6, appellant's status as an indigent will be determined after an assertion of indigency, verified by a supporting affidavit, is filed with this court: [2] Regarding the motion to supplement the record on appeal, the record does not contain a motion for extension of time for the court reporter to prepare the transcript or the circuit's order filed on August 22, 2005, granting the motion We grant the motion and direct that the record in this case be supplemented by the motion and order
456 [363 [3] Because of the failure of Darrell Brown to adequately represent his client on appeal, a copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct:
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.