ALPHIN v ALPHIN 56 6 Cite as 363 Ark 566 (2005) [363 Nina Lea ALPHIN (Surber) v David Paul ALPHIN 05-285 215 S W3d 58n Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 13, 2005 APPEAL & ERROR — ADDENDUM INSUFFICIENT — REBRIEFING ORDERED — Where the addendum was insufficient because the notice of appeal was not included, rebriefing was ordered: Rebriefing ordered James At Pratt,Jr., for appellant: No response. ER CURIAM [1] Appellant, Nina Lea Alphin appeals the p September 5, 2003, order of the Umon County Circuit Court, First Division, modifying the decree of divorce and changing custody of Megan Alphm from the appellant to the appellee, David Paul /Uphill However, in violation of Ark Sup Ct R 4-2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the addendum Pursuant to Ark Sup: Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the addendum is insufficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the
ARK ] 567 entry of this order within which to file an amended addendum Dodson v State. 357 Ark: 646, 187 S W:3d 854 (2004): Under Ark R. Sup Ct 4-2(b)(3), this court may affirm the judgment if an amended addendum is not filed within the fifteen days
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.