PINLLL vS 1. -A LE
376 Cite as 363 Ark: 376 (2005) [363 Steven PINELL v STATE of Arkansas - CR 04=1240 214 S W3d 258 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 29, 2005 APPEAL & ERROR. — ADDENDUM INSUFFICIENT — REBRIEFING ORDERED — In violation of Ark Sup, Ct, R: 4-2(a)(8), the appellant's notice of appeal was not included in the Addendum; pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct: 4-2(b)(3), the supreme court found that the Addendum was deficient, and appellant was granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended Addendum Appeal from Drew Circuit Court; R. Bynum Gibson, Judge, rebriefing ordered. Appellant, pro se. Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen , by Vada Berger, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee. ER CURIAM. [1] Stephen Pmell appeals the judgment en- p tered by the Circuit Court of Drew County, Arkansas, on June 9, 2003. However, in violation of Ark Sup, Ct, R. 4-2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the Addendum. Pursuant to Ark, Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the Addendum is deficient, and that appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of
ARK ] 377 this order within which to file an amended Addendum Dodson v. State, 357 Ark: 646, 187 S.W.3d 854 (2004). Further, this court may affirm the judgment under Ark. R. Sup. Ct. 4-2(b)(3), if an amended Addendum is not filed within fifteen days.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.