MALONE V STATE 372 Cite as 363 Ark: 372 (2005) [363 Anthony C. MALONE v. STATE of Arkansas CR 05-218 214 SW3c1258 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered September 29, 2005 APPEAL & ERROR — ADDENDUM INSUFFICIENT — REBRIEFING ORDERED: — Where, in violation of Ark: Sup: Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8), the appellant's notice of appeal was not included in the addendum, the supreme court, pursuant to Ark. Sup Ct R 4-2(13)(3), found that the addendum was insufficient, and granted appellant fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended addendum, Appeal from White Circuit Court; Robert Edwards, Judge, rebnefmg ordered: David L Dunagin, for appellant: Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Valerie L: Kelly, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee_ ER CURIAM [1] Anthony C. Malone appeals the July 9, P 2002, order of the White County Circuit Court, Second
ARK ] 373 Division, convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver and possession of marijuana with intent to deliver However, in violation of Ark: Sup: Ct: R. 4-2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the addendum: Pursuant to Ark Sup Ct R 4-2(b)(3). this court finds that the addendum is insufficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended addendum. Dodson v State, 357 Ark: b46, 187 S.W.3d 854 (2004), Under Ark. R Sup Ct 4-20)1(3), this court may affirm the judgment if an amended addendum is not filed within the fifteen days:
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.