OF '111E S TATE OF ARKANSAS. 297 Term,1857] Barkeloo et al. vs Miller. BARK T'Lcin ET AL. VS. MILLER Mr. Justice Scott: This was a sta. fa: to revive a judg-ment on a forthcoming bond. The case, is the counterpart of that of Miller vs. Barke-loo : just decided, where the judgment that was revived in this enqe wa,.; hold tn 11111TO 1-IPPT1 The judgment in this ease must, therefore, be reversed:
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.