OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. 291 Tenn, 1857] Bender vs_ Bridge & Co: BENDER VS. BRIDGE & CO. It is error to issue a joint writ of garnishment against several, with allegations of a several instead of a joint indebtedness. Error to Pulaski Circuit Court. The Hon. JOHN J. CLENDENIN, Circuit Judge. WATKINS & GALLAGHER, for the plaintiff. BERTRAND for the defendants. Mr. Justice SCOTT delivered the opinion of the Court. This cause was brought here by writ of error to the Pulaski Circuit Court, sued out by Bender. The facts of the case, in all this is material to the point of law involved, are the same, as in the case of the Cincinnati and Little Rock Slate Co. vs.
292 CASES IN THE SUPREME COURT [January Bridge & Co., (17 Ark. R. p. ) following the cases of Thorn & Robbins vs. Woodruff et al., 5 Ark. R. 55, and Moreland et al. vs. Pelham, 2 Eng. R. 338. Upon the authority of these eases, the judgment in question must be reversed, and the cause remanded. 4
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.