ARK.] CHAVIS V. PRIDGEON. 981 CHAVIS V. PRIDGEON. 4-7356 180 S. W. 2d 320 Opinion deliverbd May 15, 1944. 1. JUSTICES OF THE PEA CE — APPEALS.—Where an appeal from the judgment of a• justice of the peace, the common pleas court or a municipal court is not lodged in the office of the circuit clerk within thirty days as prescribed by Act No. 323 of 1939 the judg-
982 CHAvis V. PRIDGEON. [207 ment becomes final and dismissal of tlie appeal in the circuit court is proper. 2. STATUTES—STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—Act No. 323 of 1939 prescribing thirty days- as the time for appeal from an inferior court to the circuit court is mandatory and jurisdictional. 3. JUSTICES OF THE PEACE—APPEALS.—Where an appeal from a judgment rendered by the municipal court on March 30th was not lodged in the office of the circuit clerk until April 30th, the circuit court acquired no jurisdiction, since the appeal was not perfected within the prescribed time. Act 323 of 1939. 4. JUSTICES OF THE PEACE—APPEALS—TIME COMPUTED, HOW.—ID Computing the time for appeal the first day is to be excluded and the last day is to be included. Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court; T. G. Parham, Judge ; affirmed: . Arthur D. Chavis, for appellant. HOLT, J. March 30, 1943, appellee secured a judg-• ment against appellant in the nlunicipal court of the City of Pine Bluff. On April 23rd thereafter, appellant filed affidavit for appeal to the circuit court, and on the same date executed and filed appeal bond. April- 30, 1943, appellant filed transcript of the judgment in the. office of the clerk of the circuit court. Thereafter, on November 8, 1943, when the cause came on for trial in the circuit court, 'the court found "that the appeal herein, should be dismissed for the reason that the transcript of the judgment rendered by the Municipal Court of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, was not filed in the office of the clerk of this court within the thirty-day period prescribed by law," dismissed the appeal and remanded the cause "for enforcement of the judgment of said Municipal Court." The action of the court is questioned by this appeal. The General Assembly, at its 1939 session, passed Act 323, § 1 of which provides : "A party who appeals from a justice of the peace judiment or a common pleas judgment or a municipal court judgment must file the transcript of the judgment in the office of the circuit court clerk within 30 days after the rendition of the judgment. If the transcript of the judgment is not filed within 30 days lifter the rendition of the judgment, exe-
ARK.] CHArIs v. PRIDGEON. 283 cution can be issued against the signers of the appeal bond." - As to the effect Which should be given to this section of the act, in Lytle v. Hill, 205 Ark. 789, 170 S. W. 2d 684, we said : "This.section gives finality to the judgments of inferior courts where the transcript of the judgment is not fyied in the office of *the clerk of the circuit court witym thirty days after the rendition of the judgment, a0 authorizes the issuance of an execution against the Agners of the appeal bond as upon a final judgment. This 'act is not only mandatory, but is jurisdictional. The transcript must be filed with the clerk of the circuit court within 30 days to confer jurisdiction upon the circuit court. It was so expressly held in the case of Nowlin v. Merchants National Bank, 192 Ark. 529, 92 S. W. 2d 390,.and the holding in the case of Bridgman v. Johnson, 200 Ark. 990, 1.42 S. W. 2d 217, is to the same effect." The judgment in the. instant case was rendered on March 30, 1943, and the statute required appellant to file the. transcript . with the clerk of the circuit court within 30 days from that date. This he failed to do. In computing-the time; the ddy on which the judgment was rendered must be excluded, aud the day on which the transcript was filed must be included. In Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company v. Thme Life Accident Company, 119 Ark. 102, 178 S. W. 31 - 4 this court said : "The geueral rule is that in com- putiug the time, the first day is to be excluded, and the last dy is to be included." See, also, Robertson V. Cun-ningham, ante, p. 76, 178 S. W. 2d 314. Excluding March 30tb, the day on which the judgment was rendered, it is obvious that 31. days bad elapsed between this date and the date on which the transcript was filed, April 30, 1943. 'Finding no error, the judgment is -affirmed.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.