Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

128-1260 Pete LOWREY Jr. v. Lucy LOWREY 76 -75 538 S.W. 2d 36 Opinion delivered July 6, 1976 I )1vORCE - PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM AS PERSONAL PROPERTY - SCOPE OF STATUTE. - Divorced husband's personal injury claim in a pending'action does not constitute personal property within the meaning of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1214 which could be assigned to divorced wife as her 1/3 statutory interest in divorced husband 's property. Appeal from Lee Chancery Court, George K. Cracraft, Chancellor; reversed and remanded. William R. Wilson, Jr., P.A., for appellant. Daggett, Daggett & Van Dover, for appellee. CONLEY BYRD, Justice. The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in awarding appellee Lucy Lowrey, as part of her property rights under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1214 (Repl. 1962), a one-third interest in a pending Jones Act claim of appellant Pete Lowrey, Jr. The trial court, upon the award of divorce to appellee, awarded "as her statutory interest, one-third of all proceeds derived either by judgment or settlement from the suit of Pete Lowrey, Jr. v. Canal Barge Lines Inc." and directed appellant to execute an assignment. We reverse the action of the trial court for the reasons set forth in Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. Wright Oil Company, Inc., 248 Ark. 803, 454 S.W. 2d 69 (1970) and Fenney v. Fenney, 259 Ark. 858, 537 S.W. 2d 367 (1976). See also In re Schmelzer, 350 F. Supp. 429 (S.D. Ohio 1972). Under those authorities an unliquidated personal injury claim does not constitute personal property for purposes of assignment or by operation of law in matters of bankruptcy. Consequently, we conclude that such a personal injury claim does not constitute personal property within the meaning of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1214. Appellee's suggestion that the assignability of the unli-
ARK.] 129 quidated personal injury claim was raised for the first time on appeal is not supported by the record. Reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment not inconsistent herewith.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.