ARK.] KIMBLE V. GRAY 373 Cite as 313 Ark. 373 (1993) Rhonda KIMBLE v. Robert GRAY, Sr. 92-1486 853 S.W.2d 890 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered June 1, 19y3 APPEAL & ERROR — NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED ONE DAY TOO EARLY, AND THEREFORE HAD NO EFFECT. — Where petitioner filed her notice of appeal one day too early, her notice of appeal had no effect under the terms of Ark. R. App. P. 4(c), and her appeal was correctly dismissed. Petition for Review granted; dismissal of appeal affirmed. Kimberly D. Burnette, Child Support Enforcement Unit, for petitioner. Dale E. Adams, for respondent. [1] PER CURIAM. We granted Rhonda Kimble's petition for review of the court of appeals' per curiam granting dismissal of her appeal. Appellee, now respondent, Robert Gray, Sr., previously asked the court of appeals to determine that Kimble had failed to file a timely appeal. The court of appeals found Kimble had filed her notice of appeal one day too early, and under the terms of Rule 4(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court held Kimble's notice of appeal had no effect. The court of appeals' per curiam, Kimble v. Gray, Sr., 40 Ark. App. 196, 842 S.W.2d 473 (1992), succinctly sets out that court's authority and reasons for dismissing Kimble's appeal. Because we agree with
374 [313 the court of appeals' per curiam and ruling, we merely affirm its decision.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.