ARK.] CHORN V. STATE 381 Cite as 311 Ark. 381 (1992) Brenda CHORN v. STATE of Arkasnas
CR 92-1393 841 S.W.2d 627 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered December 21, 1992 APPEAL & ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK DENIED — NO ADMISSION BY ATTORNEY. — Where the motion for rule on the clerk admitted that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant, but counsel for appellant failed to concede it was his fault that the record was not filed or to show other good cause to grant the motion, the motion was denied. Motion for Rule on the Clerk; denied. Kearney Law Offices, for appellant. No response. PER CURIAM. Brenda Chorn, by her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The motion admits that the record was not timely filed and that it was no fault of the appellant. However, the motion does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If the attorney for Brenda Chorn will
382 [311 concede that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.