450 LEONARD V. LEONARD'S HARDWARE, INC. [309 Cite as 309 Ark. 450 (1992) John Paul and Shirley LEONARD v. LEONARD'S HARDWARE, INC., Jeannette E. Smith, et al. 92-252 828 S.W.2d 846 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 26, 1992 APPEAL & ERROR — MUST HAVE FINAL ORDER FOR APPEAL — ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO DOCKET A RECORD ON APPEAL IS NOT APPEALABLE. — An order granting an extension to docket a record on appeal is not an appealable order; the appellate court will not reach the merits of an appeal if the order appealed from is not final; for a judgment to be final, it must dismiss the parties from the court,
ARK.] LEONARD V. LEONARD'S HARDWARE, INC. 451
Cite as 309 Ark. 450 (1992) discharge them from the action, or conclude their rights to the subject matter in controversy. Appeal from Pope Chancery Court; Van B. Taylor, Chancellor; dismissed. Robert E. Irwin, for appellants. Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, by: Robert M. Honea and Mobley, Smith & Mobley, by: William F. Smith and Steve Edgar, for appellees. TOM GLAZE, Justice. John Paul and Shirley Leonard were awarded a decree below from which Jeannette Smith appealed. On January 22, 1992, Smith filed a motion to extend time for docketing the record on appeal. See Rule 5(b) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. The trial court granted Smith's motion the next day. The Leonards now attempt to appeal from the trial court's granting Smith's motion, contending the court's order failed to comply with Rule 5(b). [1] We are unable to reach the Leonards' argument in the manner sought because an order granting an extension to docket a record on appeal is not an appealable order. Ark. R. App. P. 2(a). We do not reach the merits of an appeal if the order appealed from is not final. Austin v. First Nat'l Bank, 305 Ark. 456, 808 S.W.2d 773 (1991). For a judgment to be final, it must dismiss the parties from the court, discharge them from the action, or conclude their rights to the subject matter in controversy. Jackson v. Yowell, 307 Ark. 222, 818 S.W.2d 950 (1991). Because the order the Leonards appealed from is not final, we dismiss this appeal.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.