PARKS V. HILLHAVE N ARK.] NURSING HOME 373 Cite as 309 Ark. 373 (1992) Lloyd PARKS, et al. v. HILLHAVEN NURSING HOME of Little Rock, et al. 91-339 829 S.W.2d 419 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 18, 1992 APPEAL & ERROR — LACK OF FINAL ORDER — JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION FOR APPELLATE COURT. — Where partial summary judgments were entered in favor of three of four defendants, and summary judgment was entered in favor of the fourth when appellant failed to respond, there was no final judgment, nor was there an express determination that there was any just reason for delay or express direction for the entry of judgment; the failure to comply with Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b) presented a jurisdictional issue in the appellate court that the court could raise on its own, and absent compliance, the appeal was dismissed for lack of a final order. Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Sixth Division; David Bogard, Judge; appeal dismissed. Willard Proctor, Jr., for appellant. Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, by: Amelia Mosley Russell, for appellee. DAVID NEWBERN, Justice. This is an appeal from the entry of a summary judgment. We must dismiss the appeal because not all of the claims against all of the parties have been resolved, and there has been no certification pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b) that there is no need for delay in deciding the case with respect to the parties now before us.
PARKS V. HILLHAVEN 374 NURSING HOME [309 Cite as 309 Ark. 373 (1992) The appellant, Lloyd Parks, individually and as administrator of the estate of Mary Parks, sued the appellees, Hillhaven Nursing Home of Little Rock, Dr. John Wolverton, and Little Rock Nursing Center of Little Rock, for the alleged wrongful death of his wife. The Trial Court granted summary judgment in favor of all of the defendants on all of the claims. We reversed. Parks v. Hillhaven Nursing Home, 303 Ark. 557, 798 S.W.2d 106 (1990). Upon remand, two of the three defendants, Dr. Wolverton and Little Rock Nursing Center, again filed motions for summary judgment. The Trial Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of both defendants on counts of medical malpractice, negligence, and wrongful death, but found material issues of fact with respect to the claim of wrongful transfer of the decedent. The Trial Court entered partial summary judgments on May 20, 1991. Mr. Parks sought to appeal, but we dismissed for lack of a final order. Parks v. Hillhaven Nursing Home, 309 Ark. 106, 827 S.W.2d 148 (1992). On July 3, 1991, the third defendant, Hillhaven Nursing Home, filed a separate motion for summary judgment. In response to a request from Parks the Trial Court extended the plaintiff's time in which to answer the motion until August 12, 1991. On August 20, 1991, no response had been filed, and the Trial Court entered summary judgment in favor of Hillhaven Nursing Home. Mr. Parks again seeks to appeal. When multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the . . . parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. In the absence of such determination and direction any order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates . . . the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties, and the order or other form of decision is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all of the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties. [Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b)] [1] The failure to comply with Rule 54(b) presents a jurisdictional issue in this court which we will raise on our own
ARK.] 375 and, absent compliance, we dismiss the appeal for lack of a final order. Middleton v. Stilwell, 301 Ark. 110, 782 S.W.2d 44 (1990); King v. Little Rock School Dist., 296 Ark. 522, 758 S.W.2d 708 (1988). Appeal dismissed.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.