HELTON V. ARKANSAS DEP'T 268 OF HUMAN SERV. [309 Cite as 309 Ark. 268 (1992) Jason Shavrome HELTON v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES 91-324 828 S.W.2d 842 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 4, 1992 APPEAL & ERROR — ORDER NOT FINAL — APPELLATE COURT WILL NOT REACH MERITS. — The appellate court will not reach the merits of an appeal if the order appealed from is not final. Appeal from Cross Chancery Court, Juvenile Div.; Baird Kinney, Chancellor; appeal dismissed. Killough, Ford, & Hunter, by: Robert M. Ford, for appellant. Cecilia F. Roberts, for appellee. STEELE HAYS, Justice. The Arkansas Department of Human Services filed a complaint against Jason Shavrome Helton alleging that Helton was the putative father of a child born to Angela Frazier. The Department moved for paternity blood testing pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 9-10-108 (1987). The motion was accompanied by Ms. Frazier's affidavit asserting that
ARK.] 269 she and Helton had had sexual intercourse during the period of conception and after a hearing, the chancellor ordered Helton to report for paternity testing. Helton brings this appeal from that order. The Department points out quite correctly that the order, not being final, is not appealable. Ark. R. App. P. 2(a). [1] We have held in numerous cases that we do not reach the merits of an appeal if the order appealed is not final. Corning Bank and Bailey Bippus v. Delta Rice Mills, Inc., 281 Ark. 342, 663 S.W.2d 737 (1984); Heffner v. Harrod, 278 Ark. 188, 644 S.W.2d 579 (1983); McIlroy Bank & Trust v. Zuber, 275 Ark. 345, 629 S.W.2d 304 (1982); Roberts Enter., Inc. v. Arkansas Highway Comm'n, 277 Ark. 25,638 S.W.2d 675 (1982). In these and other cases we have stated that in order for a judgment to be appealable, it must dismiss the parties from the court, discharge them from the action or conclude their rights to the subject matter in controversy. See also Johnson v. Johnson, 243 Ark. 656, 421 S.W.2d 605 (1967), and Fratesi v. Bond, 282 Ark. 213, 666 S.W.2d 712 (1984). Appeal dismissed.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.