134 [348 Wes BOOTH v. Suzanne P. BOOTH 02-165 71 S.W.3d 586 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 4, 2002 APPEAL & ERROR - PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED - CASE REMANDED FOR CONSIDERATION OF ISSUE APPELLATE COURT FAILED TO ADDRESS. - Appellant's petition for review of an unpublished court of appeals opinion, affirming as modified the lower court's division of the property of the parties was denied; however, because both parties acknowledged that the court of appeals failed to address appellant's issue on appeal concerning whether he should be given a credit regarding a loan as to the parties' boat, motor, and trailer, the matter was remanded to the court of appeals so it could decide that issue. Petition for review denied; remanded to court of appeals for limited further review. Gary D. McDonald, for appellant. Shackleford, Phillips, Wineland & Ratcliff, P.A., by: Brian H. Ratcliff for appellee. ER CURIAM. [1] Wes Booth petitions for review of an p unpublished court of appeals opinion, affirming as modified the lower court's division of Wes and Suzanne P. Booth's property. We deny Mr. Booth's petition; however, we are obliged to note that both parties acknowledge that the court of appeals failed to address Mr. Booth's issue on appeal concerning whether he should be given a credit regarding a loan from First National Bank of El Dorado as to the parties' boat, motor, and trailer. Because this point for reversal was not mentioned or considered by the court of appeals, we remand this matter to the court so it may decide that issue.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.