Supreme Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

ARK.] 233 Phillip WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas CR 01-1170 60 S.W3d 485 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered December 6, 2001 1. ATTORNEY & CLIENT - ARK. CODE ANN. § 19-4-1604 AMENDED - PERSONS EMPLOYED AS FULL-TIME PUBLIC DEFENDERS WHO ARE NOT PROVIDED STATE FUNDED SECRETARY MAY SEEK COMPENSATION FOR APPELLATE WORK. - In the most recent legislative session, the Arkansas General Assembly amended Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604 through Act 1370 of 2001, which now provides that "persons employed as full-time public defenders who are not provided a state funded secretary may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Arkansas Supreme Court or the Arkansas Court of Appeals." 2. MOTIONS - MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL DENIED - MOTION DID NOT CONTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT WHETHER COUNSEL WAS PROVIDED STATE-FUNDED SECRETARY. - The state-salaried, full-time public defender's motion to be relieved as counsel on appeal was denied because the motion did not contain information regarding whether he was provided a state-funded secretary, and without this information the supreme court could not determine whether he qualified for dismissal in light of the amendment to Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604. Motion to Be Relieved as Attorney for Appellant and to Stay Briefing Schedule; denied. Thomas B. Devine, III, Public Defender, for appellant. No response. ER CURIANI. Thomas B. Devine III, a state-salaried, full-P time conflicts public defender for the Sixth Judicial District, was appointed by the trial court to represent Appellant Phillip Williams, an indigent defendant, in his capital murder case. Following a trial, Williams was sentenced to life in prison without parole. A timely notice of appeal and request for the transcribed record have been filed. Mr. Devine now asks to be relieved as counsel for Mr. Williams in this criminal appeal as a result of this court's decision in Rushing
WILLIAMS V. STATE 234 Cite as 347 Ark. 233 (2001) [347 v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W3d 489 (2000). In Rushing, this court determined that state-salaried, full-time public defenders were ineligible for compensation by the court for work performed in the appeal of a matter in which the public defender represented the defendant. In Tester v. State, 341 Ark. 281, 16 S.W3d 227 (2000), we relieved appellant's court-appointed public defender and appointed new counsel on appeal under similar circumstances. See also, Craft v. State, 342 Ark. 57, 26 S.W3d 584 (2000); McFerrin v. State, 342 Ark. 61, 26 S.W3d 429 (2000); Bolton v. State, 342 Ark. 55, 26 S.W3d 783 (2000). [1, 2] Since the time of these decisions, however, the law has changed. In the most recent legislative session, the Arkansas General Assembly amended Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604 through Act 1370 of 2001, which now provides that "[p]ersons employed as full-time public defenders who are not provided a state funded secretary may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Arkansas Supreme Court or the Arkansas Court of Appeals." Mr. Devine's motion to be relieved as counsel on appeal is denied because the motion does not contain information regarding whether he is provided a state-funded secretary. Mr. Devine may resubmit his motion, providing information about whether he is provided a state-funded secretary, in order for us to determine whether he qualifies for dismissal in light of the amendment to Ark. Code Ann. § 19-4-1604.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.