ROSS V. STATE ARK.] Cite as 344 Ark. 417 (2001) 417 Andrew ROSS, Jr. v. STATE of Arkansas CR 01-324 39 5.W3d 458 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered April 5, 2001 ATTORNEY & CLIENT — MOTION TO BE RELIEVED — GRANTED FOR GOOD CAUSE. — Where a state-salaried, part-time public defender was ineligible for compensation by the supreme court for work performed in the appeal of the matter in question pursuant to a recent opinion, and the supreme court had relieved other public defenders and appointed new counsel on appeal under similar circumstances,
ROSS V. STATE 418 Cite as 344 Ark. 417 (2001) [344 the attorney's motion to be relieved for good cause shown was granted. Motion to Withdraw as Attorney for Appellant; granted. Charles E. Ellis, for appellant. No response. ER CURIAM. Charles E. Ellis, a state-salaried, part-time P public defender for the Second Judicial District, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant Andrew Ross, Jr., an indigent defendant, in this criminal case. Following a jury trial that concluded on August 24, 2000, Ross was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole, and the circuit court sentenced him to ten years for violating the terms of his probation on a previous charge of theft by receiving. Notices of appeal from the judgments of conviction were timely filed and a record has been lodged with our clerk. [I] Mr. Ellis now asks this court to relieve him as counsel for Ross in this criminal appeal. As a state-salaried, part-time public defender for the Second Judicial District, Mr. Ellis is ineligible for compensation by this court for work performed in the appeal of this matter pursuant to our opinion in Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W3d 489 (2000). In Tester v. State, 341 Ark. 281, 16 S.W3d 227 (2000), we relieved appellant's court-appointed public defender and appointed new counsel on appeal under similar circumstances. See also, Craft v. State, 342 Ark. 57, 26 S.W3d 584 (2000); McFerrin v. State, 342 Ark.61, 26 S.W3d 429 (2000); Bolton v. State, 342 Ark. 55, 26 S.W3d 783 (2000). We grant Mr. Ellis's motion to be relieved for good cause shown. Clay Buchanan will be substituted as attorney for appellant Andrew Ross, Jr., in this matter.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.