ARK. 1 701 Jerry WILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas CR 01-74 38 S.W3d 304 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered February 15, 2001 APPEAL & ERROR - MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL - GRANTED. - Appellant's counsel, a state-salaried, full-time public defender who had been appointed to represent appellant at trial, was relieved as counsel for the appeal process because he was ineligible for compensation by the supreme court for work performed in appealing the case. Motion to Withdraw as Attorney on Direct Appeal; Motion granted. Mark S. Frasier, for appellant. No response. ER CURIAM. Mark S. Fraiser, a state-salaried, full-time Ppublic defender for the Eighteenth Judicial District, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant Jerry Williams, an indigent defendant, in this probation-revocation case. Appellant's probation was terminated, and he was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to eight years in the Arkan-sas Department of Correction. A notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction was timely filed, and the record has been lodged with our clerk. [1] Mr. Fraiser now asks this court to relieve him as counsel for Mr. Williams in this appeal. In support of his motion to be relieved, Mr. Fraiser asserts that he is ineligible for compensation by this court for work performed in the appeal of this matter pursuant to our recent opinion in Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W3d 484 (2000). He also directs this court's attention td Tester v. State, 341 Ark. 281, 16 S.W3d 227 (2000), wherein we relieved the appellant's court-appointed public defender and appointed new counsel on appeal under similar circumstances. See also, Craft v. State, 342 Ark. 57, 26 S.W3d 584 (2000); McFerrin v. State, 342 Ark. 61, 25 S.W3d 429 (2000); Bolton v. State, 342 Ark. 55, 26 S.W3d 783
702 [ 343 (2000). We grant Mr. Fraiser's motion to be relieved for good cause shown. Ms. Ann C. Hill will . be substituted as attorney for appellant Jerry Williams.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.