298 STRAEACI V. STATE [300 Cite as 300 Ark. 298 (1989) Ford E. STRAFACI v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 88-217C 778 S.W.2d 602 Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered October 30, 1989 1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — FACTUAL BASIS FOR GUILTY PLEA MAY BE SUPPLIED AT POST-CONVICTION RELIEF HEARING. — If evidence at a
ARK.] STRAFACI V. STATE 299
Cite as 300 Ark. 298 (1989) post-conviction hearing supplies the factual basis for a plea of guilty, the failure of the trial court to establish it at the plea hearing is not reversible error. 2. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — FACTUAL BASIS FOR GUILTY PLEA SUPPLIED BY APPELLANT'S AFFIDAVIT AT POST-CONVICTION RELIEF HEARING. — Where the state, at the Rule 37 hearing, introduced into evidence an affidavit executed by appellant under oath stating that appellant shot the two victims with a shotgun, buried the bodies, and threw the shotgun into a lake; and giving the date and place of the incident, the names of accomplices, and the name of the lake where the gun could be found, the affidavit was sufficient for the trial court to conclude there was a factual basis upon which a fact finder could have found appellant guilty of first degree murder, and thus it supplied a factual basis for the plea. Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court; Gayle Ford, Judge; affirmed. David Goldman, for appellant. Steve Clark, Att'y Gen., by: C. Kent Jolliff, Asst. Att'y Gen., for appellee. DAVID NEWBERN, Justice. This is an appeal from denial of a petition pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37 on the part of the appellant, Ford E. Strafaci, to set aside a plea of guilty entered in 1983 to a charge of first degree murder. The state concedes that the court's actions in taking the plea did not comply with Ark. R. Crim. P. 24 which requires the court to establish that there is a factual basis for the plea. The issue has thus become whether the evidence taken at the Rule 37 hearing supplied the factual basis for the plea. We hold that it did, and thus the decision of the trial court is affirmed. [1] If evidence at a post-conviction hearing supplies the factual basis for a plea of guilty, the failure of the trial court to establish it at the plea hearing is not reversible error. Knee v. State, 297 Ark. 346, 760 S.W.2d 160 (1988); Snelgrove v. State, 292 Ark. 116, 728 S.W.2d 497 (1987). Strafaci argues no such factual basis was established because he testified at the Rule 37 hearing to facts which showed the killing was at least not deliberate and premeditated and at best done in self defense. [2] At the Rule 37 hearing, the state introduced an af-fadivit executed by Strafaci which included the following:
300 [300 On August 22, 1983, in Montgomery County, Arkan-sas, I shot Larry Lynn Buckelew and Edmond Callen with a shotgun that was given to me in Georgia by Luther Edward Skeels, also known as "Eddie" Skeels. Eddie Skeels knew what I was going to do with the shotgun when he gave it to me, and he aided me in planning how to shoot Larry Lynn Buckelew and Edmond Callen. After the shooting took place I and Travis Smith and Terry Miller buried their bodies, and I then threw the shotgun into Lake Hamilton near Hot Springs, Arkansas. This affidavit, which was made by Strafaci under oath, was sufficient for the trial court to conclude there was a factual basis upon which a fact finder could have found Strafaci guilty of first degree murder, and thus it supplied a factual basis for the plea. Knee v. State, supra. Affirmed.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.