312 SUMLIN V. STATE [319 Cite as 319 Ark. 312 (1995) Undra SUMLIN v. STATE of Arkansas CR 94-362 891 S.W.2d 375 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered January 23, 1995 ATTORNEY & CLIENT — INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL — WHEN SUCH A POINT MAY BE RAISED. — Ineffective assistance of counsel may not be raised as a point of direct appeal unless the issue has been considered by the Trial Court, e.g., on a motion for new trial. Appeal from Columbia Circuit Court; John Graves, Judge; affirmed. Bethel!, Callaway, Robertson, Beasle y & Cowan, by: Matthew
ARK.] 313 J. Ketcham, for appellant. Winston Bryant, Att'y Gen., by: Brad Newman, Asst. Att'y Gen., for appellee. DAVID NEWBERN, Justice. Undra Sumlin was convicted of two counts of delivery of cocaine and one count of conspiracy to deliver cocaine. He was sentenced as an habitual offender to 66 years imprisonment. His points of appeal relate only to his contention that his trial counsel was ineffective. [1] Ineffective assistance of counsel may not be raised as a point of direct appeal, Harrison v. State, 303 Ark. 247, 796 S.W.2d 329 (1990), unless the issue has been considered by the Trial Court, e.g., on a motion for new trial. Missildine v. State, 314 Ark. 500, 863 S.W.2d 813 (1993). See also Knappenberger v. State, 278 Ark. 382, 647 S.W.2d 417 (1983); Hilliard v. State, 259 Ark. 81, 531 S.W.2d 463 (1976). Affirmed.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.