ARK.] PARTIN V. STATE 255
Cite as 314 Ark. 255 (1993) Stephen PARTIN v. STATE of Arkansas CR 93-682 862 S.W.2d 431 Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered September 27, 1993 APPEAL & ERROR — WRIT OF CERTIORARI GRANTED — REASON FOR DELAY SHOWN. — Where the appellant tendered the affidavit of the court reporter, which stated that she had been unable to prepare the records in his case in a timely manner, the court, having been given
256 PARTIN V. STATE [314 Cite as 314 Ark. 255 (1993) the reason for the transcript having not been timely filed, granted appellant's petition for writ of certiorari and directed the court reporter to complete and file the transcript. Motion for Reconsideration of Denial of Request for Writ of Certiorari; motion granted. Charles A. Potter, for appellant. No response. PER CURIAM. For his motion for reconsideration of this court's denial of his July 5, 1993 request for writ of certiorari, appellant tenders the affidavit of Betty Voltz, court reporter, which states that she has been unable to prepare the records in this case, but given an additional thirty days, she will do so. Appellant had obtained a court order extending the time to file the transcript in this cause until June 17, 1993, which date was the maximum length of time to lodge such transcript with this court. Prior to June 17, 1993, appellant timely filed his motion requesting the court reporter to file the record in this matter, but having stated no reason for the delay, we denied his request. [1] The court, having now been given the reason for the transcript having not been timely filed, grants appellant's petition for writ of certiorari and directs Ms. Voltz to complete and file the transcript forthwith. The court forwards a copy of this per curiam to the Board of Certified Reporter Examiners for any action it may deem necessary 'under its rules. CORBIN, J., not participating.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.